synchronizers: CountDownLatch vs CyclicBarrier vs Phaser vs Semaphore
One three-round worker pipeline implemented with CountDownLatch (one latch per round), CyclicBarrier (reusable, with a barrier action), and Phaser (reusable, plus dynamic mid-run registration), alongside Semaphore solving the genuinely different problem of bounding concurrent access. Covers timeout behavior (CyclicBarrier permanently breaks on one timeout, Phaser doesn't) and virtual-thread compatibility, including the corrected finding that Object.wait() releases its monitor and never pinned, unlike Thread.sleep() inside synchronized. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FhzLY5p6okFva3qsnsRyvM
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Test set: com.ankurm.synchronizers.RoundOrderingCorrectnessTest
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Tests run: 41, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.514 s -- in com.ankurm.synchronizers.RoundOrderingCorrectnessTest
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user