db-migrations-flyway-liquibase: fix dead Redgate/Liquibase doc links and back the lock-defaults claim with a real transcript
Several documentation.red-gate.com and liquibase.com URLs added in the previous commit had since moved (Redgate restructured its docs under /flyway/reference/, Liquibase Pro pricing moved to /pricing); this repoints them at the current, verified-200 pages. Also captures docs/output/16-liquibase-lock-defaults-javap.txt, the trimmed javap output backing chapter 11's claim about Liquibase's default lock-poll and lock-wait settings, which chapter 11 previously asserted without a committed artifact to back it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Q6XdRjtsp4862EM44T7i9a
This commit is contained in:
@@ -64,5 +64,5 @@ installed_rank | version | description | success
|
||||
## Going deeper
|
||||
|
||||
- **`outOfOrder` is a blunt, global switch** — turning it on doesn't just allow the one late migration you're expecting, it allows *any* lower-numbered migration to slot in from then on. Flyway's own docs call this out as reducing reproducibility, and `docs/output/03-flyway-out-of-order.txt`'s third-startup log line says so verbatim: `outOfOrder mode is active. Migration of schema may not be reproducible.`
|
||||
- [`ignoreMigrationPatterns`](https://documentation.red-gate.com/flyway/flyway-cli-and-api/configuration/parameters/ignore-migration-patterns) (`rel="nofollow"`) — the error message's other suggested fix, for permanently ignoring a specific migration instead of relaxing ordering globally.
|
||||
- [`ignoreMigrationPatterns`](https://documentation.red-gate.com/fd/flyway-ignore-migration-patterns-setting-277579002.html) (`rel="nofollow"`) — the error message's other suggested fix, for permanently ignoring a specific migration instead of relaxing ordering globally.
|
||||
- A team that hits this regularly is usually missing a CI check that fails a PR when its migration's version number is lower than what's already merged to main — cheaper than relying on `outOfOrder` at all.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user