Add order-fulfillment module: Spring Modulith 2.1 boundary enforcement, events, generated docs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,813 @@
|
||||
<!-- wp:html -->
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Every modular monolith starts the same way: a clean diagram, a handful of packages
|
||||
named after the business, and a promise that <code>order</code> will not reach into
|
||||
<code>inventory</code>’s business. Six months and four developers later, somebody
|
||||
adds exactly that reach — a repository field, a quick read, “it’s all
|
||||
one database anyway” — and nothing stops them. The code compiles. The tests
|
||||
that exist still pass. The diagram is now a lie, and nobody finds out until the day
|
||||
someone tries to split the monolith and discovers the boundaries were never real.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Spring Modulith is Spring’s answer to that specific failure: not a framework
|
||||
for writing microservices-shaped code inside one deployable, but a verification tool
|
||||
that turns your package structure into a contract a test can enforce. This post builds
|
||||
a small, real order-fulfillment app with four modules, breaks the boundary between two
|
||||
of them on purpose, watches the actual test failure, fixes it, and then shows that the
|
||||
"fix" most people reach for first — routing the call through the public API
|
||||
instead of the internals — still fails, for a reason that matters more than the
|
||||
original mistake.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>Versions used in this post, verified against Maven Central’s maven-metadata.xml, not the project’s own <release> tag (which currently points at the 2.2.0-M2 milestone — a GA pointer that has been wrong before is not a GA pointer you can trust).</strong> Spring Boot 4.1.1 · Spring Modulith 2.1.1 (2.1 went GA 11 June 2026; 2.1.1 is the current patch; 2.2 exists only as milestones as of this writing) · JDK 25 LTS · H2 2.4.240 for the demo database.</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /wp:html -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--more-->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- wp:html -->
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>What a "module" is to Spring Modulith</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Spring Modulith does not introduce a new way to write Spring code. It looks at
|
||||
packages you were probably going to create anyway and gives them meaning. The default
|
||||
convention — and the one this post uses — is <strong>package by
|
||||
feature</strong>: every direct sub-package of the package holding
|
||||
<code>@SpringBootApplication</code> is a module. No XML, no registry, no annotation
|
||||
required to declare one.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The demo app has four: <code>order</code>, <code>inventory</code>, <code>shipping</code>,
|
||||
and <code>notification</code>, each a sub-package of
|
||||
<code>com.ankurm.modulithdemo</code>. Inside each module, anything directly in the
|
||||
module’s own package is that module’s <strong>public API</strong> —
|
||||
fair game for other modules to depend on. Anything one level deeper, in an
|
||||
<code>internal</code> sub-package, is exactly that: internal, and off-limits to
|
||||
everyone else, regardless of whether the Java compiler marks it <code>public</code>.
|
||||
Java’s own visibility modifiers stop at the package; Spring Modulith is the thing
|
||||
that enforces the rest.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<figure role="img" aria-label="Four modules: Inventory and Notification both depend on Order by listening for its events; Shipping depends on Inventory the same way; Order depends on nothing.">
|
||||
<svg viewBox="0 0 740 320" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
.t{font:600 15px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.h{font:600 13px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.c{font:12px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
.m{font:12px monospace;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
.lbl{font:11px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="0" width="740" height="320" fill="#ffffff"/>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="28" class="t">Module dependency graph (as generated by Documenter)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="300" y="60" width="140" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e8eefc" stroke="#5b7fc7"/>
|
||||
<text x="370" y="93" class="h" text-anchor="middle">order</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="300" y="200" width="140" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e7f4ea" stroke="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="370" y="233" class="h" text-anchor="middle">inventory</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="80" y="200" width="140" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e7f4ea" stroke="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="150" y="233" class="h" text-anchor="middle">shipping</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="520" y="200" width="160" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e7f4ea" stroke="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="600" y="226" class="h" text-anchor="middle">notification</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- inventory -> order -->
|
||||
<line x1="370" y1="200" x2="370" y2="118" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow)"/>
|
||||
<text x="378" y="160" class="lbl">listens to OrderPlaced</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- shipping -> inventory -->
|
||||
<line x1="190" y1="210" x2="300" y2="217" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow)"/>
|
||||
<text x="190" y="200" class="lbl">listens to StockReserved</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- notification -> order -->
|
||||
<path d="M 600 200 C 600 120, 450 90, 440 88" fill="none" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow)"/>
|
||||
<text x="460" y="60" class="lbl">listens to OrderPlaced</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- notification -> shipping -->
|
||||
<path d="M 520 225 C 350 290, 240 260, 222 232" fill="none" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrow)"/>
|
||||
<text x="330" y="300" class="lbl">listens to ShipmentScheduled</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<defs>
|
||||
<marker id="arrow" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto">
|
||||
<path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
</marker>
|
||||
</defs>
|
||||
|
||||
<text x="20" y="300" class="c">order has zero outgoing arrows. Nothing it does depends on inventory, shipping, or notification — by design.</text>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>That diagram is not something I drew by hand and hoped matches the code. It is the
|
||||
real output of Spring Modulith’s own <code>Documenter</code>, reading this
|
||||
repository’s bytecode and generating a PlantUML component diagram and a
|
||||
per-module canvas — see the accordion near the end of this post for the raw
|
||||
PlantUML and the full captured transcript. Every arrow is a <code>"listens to"</code>
|
||||
relationship the tool found by inspecting <code>@ApplicationModuleListener</code>
|
||||
method parameters, not something I asserted.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Notice the direction. <code>inventory</code> and <code>notification</code> both
|
||||
point at <code>order</code>, and <code>notification</code> also points at
|
||||
<code>shipping</code>. <code>order</code> points at nothing. That is not an accident of
|
||||
this particular app; it is the whole design goal, and it is the thing that gets broken
|
||||
in the next section.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>The test that makes the diagram enforceable</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The diagram above is only worth anything if something fails the build the moment it
|
||||
stops being true. That something is two lines:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">class ModularityTests {
|
||||
|
||||
ApplicationModules modules = ApplicationModules.of(Application.class);
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void verifiesModuleStructure() {
|
||||
modules.verify();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/test/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/ModularityTests.java">ModularityTests.java</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><code>ApplicationModules.of(Application.class)</code> scans the bytecode reachable
|
||||
from the application’s main package and builds the module model described above.
|
||||
<code>verify()</code> walks every type dependency it finds — constructor
|
||||
parameters, fields, method bodies, the lot — and throws
|
||||
<code>org.springframework.modulith.core.Violations</code>, a <code>RuntimeException</code>,
|
||||
the moment one of them crosses a module boundary it should not. Put it in a JUnit test
|
||||
and it becomes a build-breaking architecture check that runs on every commit, with zero
|
||||
ArchUnit rules to hand-write.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The app itself needs nothing special to make this work. Here is the whole bootstrap
|
||||
class:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@SpringBootApplication
|
||||
@Modulithic(systemName = "Order Fulfillment")
|
||||
public class Application {
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/main/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/Application.java">Application.java</a>
|
||||
— <code>@Modulithic</code> is optional (it names the system for the generated
|
||||
documentation) but <code>ApplicationModules.of()</code> works with a plain
|
||||
<code>@SpringBootApplication</code> class just as well.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The Maven coordinates for all of this are one BOM import and two starters —
|
||||
one for the main app, one for the tests:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-xml"><dependencyManagement>
|
||||
<dependencies>
|
||||
<dependency>
|
||||
<groupId>org.springframework.modulith</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>spring-modulith-bom</artifactId>
|
||||
<version>2.1.1</version>
|
||||
<type>pom</type>
|
||||
<scope>import</scope>
|
||||
</dependency>
|
||||
</dependencies>
|
||||
</dependencyManagement>
|
||||
|
||||
<dependencies>
|
||||
<dependency>
|
||||
<groupId>org.springframework.modulith</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>spring-modulith-starter-jpa</artifactId>
|
||||
</dependency>
|
||||
<dependency>
|
||||
<groupId>org.springframework.modulith</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>spring-modulith-starter-test</artifactId>
|
||||
<scope>test</scope>
|
||||
</dependency>
|
||||
</dependencies></code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/pom.xml">pom.xml</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>Breaking it on purpose</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Here is the shortcut a real developer takes under real time pressure. Before placing
|
||||
an order, <code>OrderManagement</code> wants to know whether there is enough stock.
|
||||
The honest way is to ask <code>inventory</code>’s public API. The fast way, if you
|
||||
already know the schema and you are in a hurry, is to inject
|
||||
<code>inventory.internal.StockRepository</code> directly and query it yourself:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">public class OrderManagement {
|
||||
|
||||
private final OrderRepository orders;
|
||||
private final ApplicationEventPublisher events;
|
||||
|
||||
// the shortcut: read inventory's table directly instead of asking inventory
|
||||
private final StockRepository stockShortcut;
|
||||
|
||||
public OrderManagement(OrderRepository orders,
|
||||
ApplicationEventPublisher events,
|
||||
StockRepository stockShortcut) {
|
||||
this.orders = orders;
|
||||
this.events = events;
|
||||
this.stockShortcut = stockShortcut;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Transactional
|
||||
public Order placeOrder(String sku, int quantity) {
|
||||
stockShortcut.findBySku(sku); // "it's all one database anyway"
|
||||
var order = orders.save(new Order(sku, quantity, "PLACED"));
|
||||
events.publishEvent(new OrderPlaced(order.getId(), order.getSku(), order.getQuantity()));
|
||||
return order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>This compiles. It runs. If you call the endpoint by hand, you will not see anything
|
||||
wrong. The only thing standing between this code and production is the test from the
|
||||
previous section — and here is exactly what it says when it runs against this
|
||||
version of the code:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">org.springframework.modulith.core.Violations:
|
||||
- Cycle detected: Slice inventory ->
|
||||
Slice order ->
|
||||
Slice inventory
|
||||
2. Dependencies of Slice order
|
||||
- Field <...OrderManagement.stockShortcut> has type <...inventory.internal.StockRepository>
|
||||
- Method <...OrderManagement.placeOrder(String, int)> calls method
|
||||
<...inventory.internal.StockRepository.findBySku(String)>
|
||||
- Module 'order' depends on non-exposed type
|
||||
com.ankurm.modulithdemo.inventory.internal.StockRepository within module 'inventory'!
|
||||
|
||||
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 -- BUILD FAILURE</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/01-verify-violation-failed.txt">output/01-verify-violation-failed.txt</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>One field produced two separate violations in the same run, and they are worth
|
||||
telling apart, because they have different fixes.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The second one — <code>"depends on non-exposed type"</code> — is the
|
||||
one most people expect: <code>StockRepository</code> lives under
|
||||
<code>inventory.internal</code>, and nothing outside <code>inventory</code> is allowed
|
||||
to reference it, public interface or not.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The first one — <code>"Cycle detected: Slice inventory -> Slice order
|
||||
-> Slice inventory"</code> — is the one that catches people out, and it is the
|
||||
subject of the rest of this section. <code>inventory</code> already depends on
|
||||
<code>order</code>: its <code>@ApplicationModuleListener</code> method takes
|
||||
<code>OrderPlaced</code> as a parameter, and that is a real dependency edge as far as
|
||||
Spring Modulith is concerned, identical in kind to a constructor argument. Adding a
|
||||
field that points the other way — <code>order</code> depending on anything in
|
||||
<code>inventory</code> — closes a two-module cycle, and Spring Modulith treats
|
||||
the module graph as a strict DAG by default. A cycle fails verification even before the
|
||||
tool asks whether the specific type you reached for happens to be internal.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>The instinct to fix this by "going through the public API" is natural, and it is wrong here.</strong> Watch what happens next.</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The obvious-looking fix is to leave the field, but point it at
|
||||
<code>InventoryManagement</code> — inventory’s real, intentional public
|
||||
API — instead of the internal repository:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">public class OrderManagement {
|
||||
|
||||
private final OrderRepository orders;
|
||||
private final ApplicationEventPublisher events;
|
||||
private final InventoryManagement inventory; // the real public API this time
|
||||
|
||||
public OrderManagement(OrderRepository orders,
|
||||
ApplicationEventPublisher events,
|
||||
InventoryManagement inventory) {
|
||||
this.orders = orders;
|
||||
this.events = events;
|
||||
this.inventory = inventory;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Transactional
|
||||
public Order placeOrder(String sku, int quantity) {
|
||||
if (!inventory.isInStock(sku, quantity)) {
|
||||
throw new IllegalStateException("Not enough stock for " + sku);
|
||||
}
|
||||
var order = orders.save(new Order(sku, quantity, "PLACED"));
|
||||
events.publishEvent(new OrderPlaced(order.getId(), order.getSku(), order.getQuantity()));
|
||||
return order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Run the same test against this version:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">org.springframework.modulith.core.Violations: - Cycle detected: Slice inventory ->
|
||||
Slice order ->
|
||||
Slice inventory
|
||||
2. Dependencies of Slice order
|
||||
- Field <...OrderManagement.inventory> has type <...inventory.InventoryManagement>
|
||||
- Method <...OrderManagement.placeOrder(String, int)> calls method
|
||||
<...inventory.InventoryManagement.isInStock(String, int)>
|
||||
|
||||
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 -- BUILD FAILURE
|
||||
|
||||
(No "non-exposed type" complaint this time -- InventoryManagement really is public.
|
||||
Only "Cycle detected" remains.)</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/03-cycle-via-public-api-still-failed.txt">output/03-cycle-via-public-api-still-failed.txt</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The non-exposed-type complaint is gone, exactly as expected —
|
||||
<code>InventoryManagement</code> is a perfectly legitimate public type. The cycle is
|
||||
still there, because the cycle was never about which types are public. It is about
|
||||
direction, and the direction was already spoken for the moment
|
||||
<code>inventory</code> chose to listen for <code>OrderPlaced</code>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<figure role="img" aria-label="Adding a dependency from order back to inventory, even through inventory's public API, closes a two-node cycle that ApplicationModules.verify() rejects.">
|
||||
<svg viewBox="0 0 740 260" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
.t{font:600 15px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.h{font:600 13px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.c{font:12px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
.lbl{font:11px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
.lbl2{font:11px sans-serif;fill:#c56a54}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="0" width="740" height="260" fill="#ffffff"/>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="28" class="t">Closing the loop: order ↔ inventory</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="140" y="80" width="150" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e8eefc" stroke="#5b7fc7"/>
|
||||
<text x="215" y="113" class="h" text-anchor="middle">order</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="450" y="80" width="150" height="56" rx="8" fill="#e7f4ea" stroke="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="525" y="113" class="h" text-anchor="middle">inventory</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- inventory -> order, existing, solid green -->
|
||||
<path d="M 450 100 C 380 60, 310 60, 292 95" fill="none" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arrowg)"/>
|
||||
<text x="330" y="55" class="lbl">listens to OrderPlaced (already there)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- order -> inventory, new, dashed red -->
|
||||
<path d="M 292 125 C 360 165, 420 165, 448 128" fill="none" stroke="#c56a54" stroke-width="2.5" stroke-dasharray="5 4" marker-end="url(#arrowr)"/>
|
||||
<text x="330" y="185" class="lbl2">calls InventoryManagement.isInStock(...) (the "fix")</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<defs>
|
||||
<marker id="arrowg" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto">
|
||||
<path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
</marker>
|
||||
<marker id="arrowr" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto">
|
||||
<path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#c56a54"/>
|
||||
</marker>
|
||||
</defs>
|
||||
|
||||
<text x="20" y="225" class="c">Routing the second arrow through InventoryManagement — a real public type — removes the</text>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="243" class="c">"non-exposed type" violation but not the cycle. verify() still fails: two arrows, two directions, one pair of modules.</text>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The only fix that actually works is to not add the second edge. <code>order</code>
|
||||
publishes <code>OrderPlaced</code> and stops caring what happens to it:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@Service
|
||||
public class OrderManagement {
|
||||
|
||||
private final OrderRepository orders;
|
||||
private final ApplicationEventPublisher events;
|
||||
|
||||
public OrderManagement(OrderRepository orders, ApplicationEventPublisher events) {
|
||||
this.orders = orders;
|
||||
this.events = events;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Transactional
|
||||
public Order placeOrder(String sku, int quantity) {
|
||||
var order = orders.save(new Order(sku, quantity, "PLACED"));
|
||||
events.publishEvent(new OrderPlaced(order.getId(), order.getSku(), order.getQuantity()));
|
||||
return order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/main/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/order/OrderManagement.java">OrderManagement.java</a>
|
||||
(final version)</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 -- in ModularityTests
|
||||
BUILD SUCCESS
|
||||
|
||||
Same four modules, same ApplicationModules.verify() call, zero violations. The only
|
||||
change from output/01 is that OrderManagement no longer depends on anything in
|
||||
inventory, in either direction.</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/02-verify-passed.txt">output/02-verify-passed.txt</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>If inventory genuinely cannot satisfy an order, that has to travel back as a new
|
||||
event <code>order</code> deliberately chooses to listen for — a second,
|
||||
intentional relationship, not a shortcut around the first one. Keeping that
|
||||
back-channel from becoming a cycle of its own is a big enough topic that it gets its
|
||||
own post later in this series, on the Saga pattern.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<div><details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>Going deeper: NamedInterface and open modules — when a module needs to expose more than its base package</strong></summary>
|
||||
<div style="padding:12px 4px 4px 4px">
|
||||
<p>Sometimes a module genuinely needs to expose more than flat types in its base
|
||||
package — an SPI sub-package meant for one or two trusted callers, say. Spring
|
||||
Modulith has two escape hatches, both narrower than they look:</p>
|
||||
<p><code>@NamedInterface("spi")</code> on a <code>package-info.java</code> inside
|
||||
<code>inventory.spi</code> promotes that one sub-package to additional public API,
|
||||
referenced from other modules’ <code>@ApplicationModule(allowedDependencies =
|
||||
"inventory :: spi")</code> declarations. It is scoped and explicit — exactly one
|
||||
extra package, named in the dependency declaration of whoever is allowed to use it.</p>
|
||||
<p><code>@ApplicationModule(type = Type.OPEN)</code> on the module’s
|
||||
<code>package-info.java</code> is the blunt version: every internal type in that module
|
||||
becomes visible to everyone. The reference documentation is direct about this not being
|
||||
recommended for a well-modularized application, and after watching
|
||||
<code>verify()</code> catch the <code>StockRepository</code> shortcut above, it should
|
||||
be obvious why — <code>OPEN</code> does not fix the design problem, it just turns
|
||||
off the thing that was telling you about it.</p>
|
||||
<p>Neither of these would have saved the <code>order</code> → <code>inventory</code>
|
||||
shortcut in this post. They widen who can see a module’s internals; they do
|
||||
nothing about a cycle, which is a statement about direction, not visibility.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details></div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>How the cascade actually runs underneath</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Once <code>order</code> publishes <code>OrderPlaced</code> and gets out of the way,
|
||||
three independent listeners pick it up. Here is <code>inventory</code>’s:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@Service
|
||||
public class InventoryManagement {
|
||||
|
||||
private final StockRepository stock;
|
||||
private final ApplicationEventPublisher events;
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean isInStock(String sku, int quantity) {
|
||||
return stock.findBySku(sku).map(s -> s.getAvailable() >= quantity).orElse(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ApplicationModuleListener
|
||||
public void on(OrderPlaced event) {
|
||||
var item = stock.findBySku(event.sku()).orElseThrow();
|
||||
item.reserve(event.quantity());
|
||||
stock.save(item);
|
||||
events.publishEvent(new StockReserved(event.orderId(), event.sku(), item.getAvailable()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/main/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/inventory/InventoryManagement.java">InventoryManagement.java</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><code>@ApplicationModuleListener</code> looks like a plain marker annotation. It is
|
||||
not. Reading the actual compiled class file — not the reference docs, the
|
||||
bytecode — shows exactly what it expands to:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">$ javap -v org/springframework/modulith/events/ApplicationModuleListener.class
|
||||
|
||||
RuntimeVisibleAnnotations:
|
||||
0: Async
|
||||
1: Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
|
||||
2: TransactionalEventListener</code></pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>So <code>@ApplicationModuleListener</code> is <code>@Async</code> +
|
||||
<code>@Transactional(propagation = REQUIRES_NEW)</code> +
|
||||
<code>@TransactionalEventListener</code>, stacked as meta-annotations on one
|
||||
declaration. That combination is the whole mechanism:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li><strong>@TransactionalEventListener</strong>, default phase <code>AFTER_COMMIT</code>:
|
||||
the listener only runs once the transaction that published the event has actually
|
||||
committed. Publish inside a transaction that rolls back, and the listener never fires
|
||||
— which is correct, and also means publishing an event from code with no active
|
||||
transaction at all silently does nothing. (<code>Scenario.publish()</code>, from the
|
||||
test library, wraps the publish in its own transaction for exactly this reason.)</li>
|
||||
<li><strong>@Async</strong>: the listener runs on a separate thread, after the
|
||||
publishing method has already returned. <code>OrderManagement.placeOrder()</code>
|
||||
finishes and gives the caller an <code>Order</code> back long before
|
||||
<code>inventory</code> has reserved anything.</li>
|
||||
<li><strong>@Transactional(REQUIRES_NEW)</strong>: the listener gets its own
|
||||
transaction, independent of whatever was happening when the event was published. If the
|
||||
listener fails, it cannot roll back the order that triggered it.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>Do not add your own @Transactional on top of this.</strong> It looks like harmless extra documentation of intent. It is not. A plain @Transactional (default propagation REQUIRED) stacked on an @ApplicationModuleListener method breaks Spring's own listener registration, and the whole ApplicationContext refuses to start:</blockquote>
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: @TransactionalEventListener method must not
|
||||
be annotated with @Transactional unless when declared as REQUIRES_NEW or NOT_SUPPORTED:
|
||||
public void com.ankurm.modulithdemo.inventory.InventoryManagement.on(OrderPlaced)
|
||||
at org.springframework.transaction.annotation
|
||||
.RestrictedTransactionalEventListenerFactory.createApplicationListener(...)
|
||||
|
||||
Caused by: BeanInitializationException: Failed to process @EventListener annotation
|
||||
on bean with name 'inventoryManagement'</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/05-redundant-transactional-failure.txt">output/05-redundant-transactional-failure.txt</a></p>
|
||||
<p>This is a fail-fast mistake, at least — the context simply will not come up, so
|
||||
it cannot ship silently. It is still worth knowing before it costs you a confused ten
|
||||
minutes staring at a stack trace three frames removed from the line you actually
|
||||
wrote.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Put the three listeners together and one <code>publishEvent()</code> call fans out
|
||||
into four separate invocations, each on its own thread, in causal order but with no
|
||||
ordering guarantee between independent branches:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<figure role="img" aria-label="Timeline: placing an order publishes OrderPlaced, which inventory and notification react to independently; inventory's reservation then triggers shipping, which notification reacts to a second time.">
|
||||
<svg viewBox="0 0 740 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
.t{font:600 15px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.h{font:600 12px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.c{font:11px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
.m{font:11px monospace;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="0" width="740" height="300" fill="#ffffff"/>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="26" class="t">One publishEvent() call, four listener invocations</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- lanes -->
|
||||
<text x="20" y="60" class="h">order</text>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="120" class="h">inventory</text>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="180" class="h">shipping</text>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="240" class="h">notification</text>
|
||||
<line x1="110" y1="60" x2="720" y2="60" stroke="#e2e5ea"/>
|
||||
<line x1="110" y1="120" x2="720" y2="120" stroke="#e2e5ea"/>
|
||||
<line x1="110" y1="180" x2="720" y2="180" stroke="#e2e5ea"/>
|
||||
<line x1="110" y1="240" x2="720" y2="240" stroke="#e2e5ea"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<circle cx="150" cy="60" r="6" fill="#5b7fc7"/>
|
||||
<text x="150" y="42" class="m" text-anchor="middle">placeOrder()</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<line x1="150" y1="60" x2="300" y2="120" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-dasharray="2 3"/>
|
||||
<circle cx="300" cy="120" r="6" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="300" y="102" class="m" text-anchor="middle">on(OrderPlaced)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<line x1="150" y1="60" x2="300" y2="240" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-dasharray="2 3"/>
|
||||
<circle cx="300" cy="240" r="6" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="300" y="262" class="m" text-anchor="middle">on(OrderPlaced)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<line x1="300" y1="120" x2="480" y2="180" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-dasharray="2 3"/>
|
||||
<circle cx="480" cy="180" r="6" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="480" y="162" class="m" text-anchor="middle">on(StockReserved)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<line x1="480" y1="180" x2="630" y2="240" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-dasharray="2 3"/>
|
||||
<circle cx="630" cy="240" r="6" fill="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="630" y="262" class="m" text-anchor="middle">on(ShipmentScheduled)</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<text x="20" y="290" class="c">Dashed lines are @ApplicationModuleListener hops — each runs async, in its own REQUIRES_NEW transaction, on its own thread.</text>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Running the whole chain for real, from a test that boots all four modules together,
|
||||
produces exactly that:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">INFO [task-2] NotificationManagement : Order 1 received for 3x WIDGET-1
|
||||
INFO [task-4] NotificationManagement : Order 1 is on its way (WIDGET-1)
|
||||
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 -- BUILD SUCCESS</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/06-event-flow-passed.txt">output/06-event-flow-passed.txt</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Getting that test to run at all — and the very specific way it fails the first
|
||||
time — is its own lesson about a different Spring Modulith default, and it is
|
||||
worth a section of its own.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>Testing an event cascade that crosses modules it does not depend on</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><code>@ApplicationModuleTest</code> is Spring Modulith’s replacement for
|
||||
<code>@SpringBootTest</code> in a single module’s tests: instead of booting the
|
||||
entire application, it boots just the module under test, plus whichever other modules
|
||||
<code>mode</code> tells it to include. <code>BootstrapMode.ALL_DEPENDENCIES</code>
|
||||
sounds like exactly what you want for an integration test that follows an event across
|
||||
three modules. Here is the first version of that test, written the way the name
|
||||
suggests it should work:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p class="c">(annotation: <code>@ApplicationModuleTest(mode =
|
||||
BootstrapMode.ALL_DEPENDENCIES)</code> on a test in the <code>order</code> package,
|
||||
publishing <code>OrderPlaced</code> and waiting for <code>ShipmentScheduled</code>)</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">Bootstrapping @ApplicationModuleTest for Order in mode ALL_DEPENDENCIES
|
||||
# Order
|
||||
> Base package: com.ankurm.modulithdemo.order
|
||||
> Direct module dependencies: none
|
||||
> Spring beans:
|
||||
+ ?.OrderController
|
||||
+ ?.OrderManagement
|
||||
o ?.internal.OrderRepository
|
||||
|
||||
org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException: ... expected the predicate to return
|
||||
<true> but it returned <false> for input of <[]> within 10 seconds.</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c">Full transcript: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/04-event-flow-missing-dependency.txt">output/04-event-flow-missing-dependency.txt</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Ten seconds of nothing, then a timeout. The log line that explains it is easy to
|
||||
miss on a first read: <strong><code>Direct module dependencies: none</code></strong>.
|
||||
<code>ALL_DEPENDENCIES</code> bootstraps the modules the module under test <em>depends
|
||||
on</em> — the modules it imports from. It does not infer the reverse: modules that
|
||||
depend on <em>it</em>, by listening for its events. <code>order</code> imports nothing
|
||||
from <code>inventory</code>, <code>shipping</code>, or <code>notification</code> —
|
||||
correctly, as the whole first half of this post just finished establishing — so
|
||||
from <code>order</code>’s point of view, in this test, those three modules do not
|
||||
exist. <code>InventoryManagement</code> is never instantiated. The event is published
|
||||
into a context with no listener to receive it, and the test waits for something that
|
||||
was never going to arrive.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>ALL_DEPENDENCIES follows your code's import graph, not your event graph.</strong> If the thing you want to test is a reaction to an event — which, in an event-driven module boundary, is most of what there is to test — you have to say so explicitly.</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The fix is <code>extraIncludes</code>, which names modules to bootstrap regardless of
|
||||
whether the module under test has a code dependency on them:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@ApplicationModuleTest(
|
||||
mode = ApplicationModuleTest.BootstrapMode.ALL_DEPENDENCIES,
|
||||
extraIncludes = { "inventory", "shipping", "notification" })
|
||||
class OrderFulfillmentIntegrationTests {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void placingAnOrderCascadesThroughInventoryAndShipping(Scenario scenario) {
|
||||
scenario.publish(new OrderPlaced(1L, "WIDGET-1", 3))
|
||||
.andWaitForEventOfType(ShipmentScheduled.class)
|
||||
.matching(event -> event.orderId().equals(1L))
|
||||
.toArriveAndVerify(event -> {
|
||||
if (!event.sku().equals("WIDGET-1")) {
|
||||
throw new AssertionError("expected WIDGET-1, got " + event.sku());
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/test/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/order/OrderFulfillmentIntegrationTests.java">OrderFulfillmentIntegrationTests.java</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>With <code>inventory</code>, <code>shipping</code>, and <code>notification</code>
|
||||
named explicitly, their listener beans exist, the cascade actually runs, and this is
|
||||
the test that produced the passing transcript in the previous section. The
|
||||
<code>Scenario</code> API itself — <code>publish(event).andWaitForEventOfType(X.class)
|
||||
.matching(...).toArriveAndVerify(...)</code> — is Spring Modulith’s
|
||||
Awaitility-backed way of asserting on an async, eventually-consistent chain without a
|
||||
hand-rolled <code>Thread.sleep()</code>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>What the defaults do not do</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Everything so far has been about getting the happy path to compile, pass, and run.
|
||||
Two defaults are worth knowing about before this goes anywhere near production, because
|
||||
neither one fails loudly.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Every <code>@ApplicationModuleListener</code> gets one row in the event publication
|
||||
registry — a table Spring Modulith creates for you (via
|
||||
<code>spring-modulith-starter-jpa</code> or <code>-jdbc</code>) the moment an event is
|
||||
published, before the listener even runs:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<figure role="img" aria-label="Event publication lifecycle: PUBLISHED moves to PROCESSING, then COMPLETED on success or FAILED on exception; FAILED can be resubmitted back to PROCESSING. A staleness monitor that would otherwise rescue a stuck row is disabled by default.">
|
||||
<svg viewBox="0 0 740 260" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
.t{font:600 15px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.h{font:600 12px sans-serif;fill:#2b2f38}
|
||||
.c{font:11px sans-serif;fill:#5b6270}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
<rect x="0" y="0" width="740" height="260" fill="#ffffff"/>
|
||||
<text x="20" y="26" class="t">One row per @ApplicationModuleListener, per event</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="30" y="70" width="140" height="48" rx="8" fill="#fdeccf" stroke="#c9973f"/>
|
||||
<text x="100" y="99" class="h" text-anchor="middle">PUBLISHED</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="230" y="70" width="140" height="48" rx="8" fill="#fdeccf" stroke="#c9973f"/>
|
||||
<text x="300" y="99" class="h" text-anchor="middle">PROCESSING</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="430" y="20" width="140" height="48" rx="8" fill="#e7f4ea" stroke="#4a9d63"/>
|
||||
<text x="500" y="49" class="h" text-anchor="middle">COMPLETED</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="430" y="120" width="140" height="48" rx="8" fill="#f7d9d3" stroke="#c56a54"/>
|
||||
<text x="500" y="149" class="h" text-anchor="middle">FAILED</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="630" y="120" width="95" height="48" rx="8" fill="#fdeccf" stroke="#c9973f"/>
|
||||
<text x="677" y="142" class="h" text-anchor="middle" font-size="11">RESUBMITTED</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<line x1="170" y1="94" x2="230" y2="94" stroke="#c9973f" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#a3)"/>
|
||||
<line x1="370" y1="85" x2="430" y2="55" stroke="#4a9d63" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#a4)"/>
|
||||
<text x="375" y="60" class="c">listener returns</text>
|
||||
<line x1="370" y1="105" x2="430" y2="135" stroke="#c56a54" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#a5)"/>
|
||||
<text x="375" y="135" class="c">listener throws</text>
|
||||
<line x1="570" y1="144" x2="630" y2="144" stroke="#c9973f" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#a6)"/>
|
||||
<path d="M 677 120 C 677 40, 600 20, 575 35" fill="none" stroke="#c9973f" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="3 3" marker-end="url(#a7)"/>
|
||||
<text x="585" y="15" class="c" font-size="10">on retry success</text>
|
||||
|
||||
<defs>
|
||||
<marker id="a3" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto"><path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#c9973f"/></marker>
|
||||
<marker id="a4" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto"><path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#4a9d63"/></marker>
|
||||
<marker id="a5" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto"><path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#c56a54"/></marker>
|
||||
<marker id="a6" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto"><path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#c9973f"/></marker>
|
||||
<marker id="a7" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="8" refX="6" refY="4" orient="auto"><path d="M0,0 L8,4 L0,8 z" fill="#c9973f"/></marker>
|
||||
</defs>
|
||||
|
||||
<rect x="30" y="190" width="690" height="50" rx="6" fill="#f4f5f7" stroke="#b7bec9" stroke-dasharray="3 3"/>
|
||||
<text x="45" y="210" class="c">A crash between PUBLISHED and PROCESSING leaves a row stuck. The staleness monitor that would</text>
|
||||
<text x="45" y="228" class="c">mark it FAILED is off by default — all three spring.modulith.events.staleness.* durations default to zero.</text>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>That row is what makes the registry useful at all — it is how a listener that
|
||||
threw an exception can be found and resubmitted later, and how a process that died
|
||||
between "published" and "handled" does not just lose the event. But two defaults blunt
|
||||
that guarantee more than the reference documentation’s tone suggests:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li>The default completion mode is <code>UPDATE</code>: completed rows are marked
|
||||
complete and left in the table, forever, growing without bound unless something purges
|
||||
them. <code>DELETE</code> removes them (and loses the ability to query completed
|
||||
publications); <code>ARCHIVE</code> moves them to a separate table first, which is
|
||||
usually the one you actually want.</li>
|
||||
<li>The staleness monitor — the background task that would notice a row stuck in
|
||||
<code>PUBLISHED</code> or <code>PROCESSING</code> after a crash and mark it
|
||||
<code>FAILED</code> so it becomes eligible for resubmission — is disabled by
|
||||
default. All three <code>spring.modulith.events.staleness.*</code> durations default to
|
||||
zero, which this library treats as "off", not "immediately stale".</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>A crash at exactly the wrong moment leaves a row nobody is looking for, by default.</strong> Set the staleness durations and a non-UPDATE completion mode before this matters in production:</blockquote>
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-yaml">spring.modulith.events.staleness.published=PT5M
|
||||
spring.modulith.events.staleness.processing=PT5M
|
||||
spring.modulith.events.staleness.resubmitted=PT5M
|
||||
spring.modulith.events.completion-mode=ARCHIVE</code></pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>None of this is a defect in Spring Modulith — it is a reasonable default for a
|
||||
library that has to work the same way whether you are prototyping on an in-memory H2
|
||||
database or running a Kafka-backed outbox in production. It is, however, exactly the
|
||||
kind of default that an architecture diagram does not show you, which is the theme of
|
||||
this whole post applied one layer down: the tool that verifies your module boundaries
|
||||
has its own quiet defaults, and they reward the same treatment — read the actual
|
||||
behavior, not the one-paragraph summary.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>Generated documentation, not hand-maintained diagrams</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The module diagram earlier in this post, and the arrows in it, came from running
|
||||
this:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@Test
|
||||
void writesDocumentation() {
|
||||
new Documenter(modules)
|
||||
.writeModulesAsPlantUml()
|
||||
.writeIndividualModulesAsPlantUml()
|
||||
.writeModuleCanvases()
|
||||
.writeAggregatingDocument();
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/test/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/ModularityTests.java">ModularityTests.java</a>
|
||||
(the <code>writesDocumentation()</code> test)</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><code>Documenter</code> reads the same <code>ApplicationModules</code> model
|
||||
<code>verify()</code> checks and writes a PlantUML component diagram, one PlantUML
|
||||
diagram per module showing just that module’s direct dependencies, a tabular
|
||||
"canvas" per module (Spring beans, grouped by stereotype), and an Asciidoc file linking
|
||||
all of it together — to <code>target/spring-modulith-docs</code> by default.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<div><details>
|
||||
<summary><strong>The raw generated output for this app</strong></summary>
|
||||
<div style="padding:12px 4px 4px 4px">
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">Rel(Notification, Order, "listens to")
|
||||
Rel(Shipping, Inventory, "listens to")
|
||||
Rel(Inventory, Order, "listens to")
|
||||
Rel(Notification, Shipping, "listens to")
|
||||
|
||||
module-order.adoc:
|
||||
|Spring components
|
||||
|_Controllers_
|
||||
* c.a.m.o.OrderController
|
||||
_Services_
|
||||
* c.a.m.o.OrderManagement</code></pre>
|
||||
<p>Full transcript, including every generated <code>.puml</code> and <code>.adoc</code>
|
||||
file: <a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/output/07-generated-docs.txt">output/07-generated-docs.txt</a>. Note that the diagram the generator
|
||||
produces is a C4-style PlantUML file meant for a build pipeline to render —
|
||||
this post hand-draws the equivalent SVG instead, to match the rest of the
|
||||
site, but the relationships in it are copied directly from this generated
|
||||
output, not invented.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details></div>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The practical value of this is less "pretty diagrams" and more "diagrams that cannot
|
||||
quietly go stale", because they are regenerated from the actual compiled module
|
||||
structure on every build, the same build that is already failing if that structure
|
||||
violates its own rules.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>One more failure, worth a sentence, because it will happen to you too</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Before any of the module-boundary content above, the very first time this
|
||||
repository’s tests ran against a real database, they failed on something that
|
||||
has nothing to do with Spring Modulith at all:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-console">org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLSyntaxErrorException: Syntax error in SQL statement
|
||||
"create table [*]order (id bigint ..., primary key (id))"; expected "identifier"</code></pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Hibernate defaults a JPA entity’s table name to the class’s simple name.
|
||||
<code>Order</code> the Java class becomes <code>order</code> the table, and
|
||||
<code>ORDER</code> is a reserved SQL keyword — the <code>ORDER BY</code> clause
|
||||
— in H2, Postgres, MySQL, and the SQL standard generally. The fix is one
|
||||
annotation:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre><code class="language-java">@Entity
|
||||
@Table(name = "orders") // ORDER is a reserved SQL keyword (ORDER BY)
|
||||
public class Order {
|
||||
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
|
||||
private Long id;
|
||||
private String sku;
|
||||
private int quantity;
|
||||
private String status;
|
||||
}</code></pre>
|
||||
<p class="c"><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/src/main/java/com/ankurm/modulithdemo/order/internal/Order.java">Order.java</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>If you are naming an entity after a core domain concept in an order-processing system, check it against your database's reserved-word list before the schema generator does it for you.</strong> ORDER, GROUP, USER, and DATE have all caught people this way at least once.</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>Should you reach for this?</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote style="background:#f4f5f7;border:1px solid #e2e5ea;border-left:4px solid #b7bec9;border-radius:6px;padding:16px 20px;"><strong>Spring Modulith is worth adding the moment more than one person is working in the same Spring Boot codebase and "please don't reach into that package" has ever been said out loud in a code review.</strong> It is not worth adding to a single-developer side project, or to a monolith you are about to split into services anyway — in that case, write the ArchUnit rules for the specific boundary you are about to cut, run them for a few weeks, and extract. ApplicationModules.verify() earns its keep as a standing, automatically-discovered rule set across a whole codebase over months and years, not as a one-time check before a big refactor.</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The next post in this series uses this same repository to work through the question
|
||||
that follows naturally from everything above: once your modules are genuinely decoupled
|
||||
and verified, when — if ever — does it actually pay to split them into
|
||||
separate services? And two posts after that, the Transactional Outbox post comes back
|
||||
to the event publication registry diagram above and does something with the completion
|
||||
states this one only described: externalizing events to Kafka, and replaying the ones
|
||||
that got stuck.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Further reading</h3>
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li><a href="https://ankurm.com/git.app/asmhatre/spring-modulith-demo/src/branch/main/order-fulfillment/README.md">Companion repository README</a> — versions, module table, and an index of every captured transcript</li>
|
||||
<li><a href="https://docs.spring.io/spring-modulith/reference/fundamentals.html" rel="nofollow">Spring Modulith reference — Fundamentals</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="https://docs.spring.io/spring-modulith/reference/events.html" rel="nofollow">Spring Modulith reference — Application Events</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-modulith/releases/tag/2.1.1" rel="nofollow">Spring Modulith 2.1.1 release notes</a></li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /wp:html -->
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user