Files
spring-async-demo/virtual-threads-benchmark-webflux/README.md
T
Claude c462fcb663 Add virtual-threads-benchmark-webflux: the WebFlux leg of the three-way benchmark
Re-uses the platform/virtual-thread transcripts already committed in
virtual-threads-benchmark rather than re-measuring them, and adds a WebFlux
module measured the same way (client-side java.net.http.HttpClient load
generator against a real Netty server). Covers I/O-bound throughput, a
naive-vs-offloaded CPU-bound comparison that turned up a real, counter-
intuitive fact about this sandbox's default thread-pool sizes
(LoopResources.DEFAULT_IO_WORKER_COUNT=4 vs Schedulers.parallel()'s
availableProcessors()=2), and an event-loop-starvation scenario showing
what the naive endpoint actually costs unrelated /io traffic on the same
server. Companion code for the ankurm.com post "Virtual Threads vs WebFlux
vs Platform Threads: Benchmarks and a Decision Framework." Also fixes the
root README's module table, which was missing the virtual-threads-benchmark
row from an earlier commit.
2026-09-19 08:31:51 +00:00

62 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

# virtual-threads-webflux-benchmark
Companion module for the ankurm.com post **"Virtual Threads vs Reactive (WebFlux) vs Platform
Threads: Benchmarks and a Decision Framework."** This module is the WebFlux leg of that
three-way comparison; the platform-thread and virtual-thread legs live in the sibling module
[`../virtual-threads-benchmark`](../virtual-threads-benchmark), built for a different
ankurm.com post and reused here rather than re-run, so the platform/virtual numbers quoted in
this post are the same numbers, not a second measurement of the same thing.
Every number below is from a real concurrent load run against a real running embedded Netty
server on this JDK, using the identical client-side load generator
(`java.net.http.HttpClient`, virtual-thread executor, client-side only) as the sibling module.
## Versions (verified against `repo1.maven.org` maven-metadata.xml and Spring Boot's own `spring-boot-dependencies` POM, not aggregators)
| Component | Version | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| JDK | 25 (Temurin 25.0.4.1+1) | same as `../virtual-threads-benchmark` |
| Spring Boot | 4.1.1 | latest GA at time of writing |
| Spring Framework | 7.0.9 | latest GA |
| Reactor | managed by `spring-boot-dependencies` 4.1.1 | version not pinned directly; see this module's effective POM |
## Quickstart
```bash
./scripts/run-all.sh # regenerates every file in docs/output/ from a real test run
./scripts/run.sh # start on :8080
```
Requires JDK 25 and Maven. This module's own benchmark ran on the same 2 vCPU sandbox as
`../virtual-threads-benchmark` -- see
[docs/01-webflux-benchmark-methodology.md](docs/01-webflux-benchmark-methodology.md) for why
that matters and what it means for the numbers below.
## What's demonstrated where
| Area | Source | Test | Transcript |
|---|---|---|---|
| I/O-bound throughput: WebFlux, 600 concurrent, same shape as virtual threads | [`ReactiveDemoController`](src/main/java/com/ankurm/vthreadswebflux/ReactiveDemoController.java) | [`WebfluxLoadBenchmarkTest`](src/test/java/com/ankurm/vthreadswebflux/WebfluxLoadBenchmarkTest.java) | [`01`](docs/output/01-io-bound-webflux.txt) |
| CPU-bound throughput: naive (event loop) vs offloaded (`Schedulers.parallel()`), 60 concurrent -- and why the gap is smaller than expected on this box | same | same | [`02`](docs/output/02-cpu-bound-webflux.txt) |
| Event-loop starvation: what the naive CPU endpoint actually costs *other* traffic on the same server | [`CpuWork`](src/main/java/com/ankurm/vthreadswebflux/CpuWork.java) | same | [`03`](docs/output/03-event-loop-starvation.txt) |
## Documentation chapters
1. [WebFlux benchmark methodology and results](docs/01-webflux-benchmark-methodology.md) --
I/O-bound, CPU-bound naive vs offloaded, and the event-loop-starvation scenario the isolated
CPU benchmark can't show, all on this sandbox's real hardware
## A note on this module's relationship to `../virtual-threads-benchmark`
[`../virtual-threads-benchmark`](../virtual-threads-benchmark) already contains a real,
re-run platform-thread vs virtual-thread benchmark on this exact hardware and JDK, built for
[Virtual Threads on Spring Boot 4.1](https://ankurm.com/leveraging-virtual-threads-in-spring-boot-3-4-building-high-throughput-services/).
This module deliberately does not re-measure that comparison -- it reuses those committed
transcripts and adds only the WebFlux leg, using the same client-side load-generation method,
so the three-way post can quote one consistent measurement approach across all three models
instead of stitching together benchmarks run different ways.
## License
MIT -- see [LICENSE](LICENSE).