1
0
Files
spring-security-demo/context-propagation/docs/04-executor-wrapping.md
asmhatre 5e9e7f1b12 Split into per-article modules and add the method-security module
Moves the existing virtual-thread/context-propagation project into
context-propagation/ and adds method-security/ for the Spring Security 7
method-security article: nine runnable demos, fourteen assertions, and every
transcript the article quotes, regenerated by scripts/run-all.sh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RSrsDSRKVsY588yFiMJMo9
2026-08-25 02:01:29 +00:00

66 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown

# 4. Executor, ExecutorService, and AsyncTaskExecutor wrapping
[&larr; Prev: Structured concurrency](03-structured-concurrency.md) | [Next: Reactive context &rarr;](05-reactive-context.md)
Chapters 1&ndash;3 are all about virtual threads and structured concurrency, which came later.
`Demo4ExecutorWrapping.java` goes back to the baseline the post's "Using @Async", "Using
ExecutorService", and "Using CompletableFuture" sections describe: a **fixed platform-thread
pool** (`ThreadPoolExecutor`, `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor`), the shape almost every Spring app used
before `spring.threads.virtual.enabled` existed, and the exact pooled-thread danger
[Chapter 1](01-inheritable-threadlocal.md) demonstrated for `InheritableThreadLocal`. Full
output in [`docs/output/demo4.txt`](output/demo4.txt).
## The three wrapper classes the post names
- **`DelegatingSecurityContextExecutorService`** wraps an entire `ExecutorService` --
`execute()`, `submit()`, `invokeAll()`, `invokeAny()` all go through the wrapper. This is
the fix for the post's `TaskExecutionService` ("Using ExecutorService") example.
- **`DelegatingSecurityContextExecutor`** wraps a plain `Executor` and is what you hand to
`CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(supplier, executor)` -- the fix for
`CompletableFutureService` ("Using CompletableFuture"). The common `ForkJoinPool` that
`CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(supplier)` uses when you don't supply an executor never
propagates context; scenario C2 in the output shows that directly.
- **`DelegatingSecurityContextAsyncTaskExecutor`** wraps Spring's own
`AsyncTaskExecutor`/`TaskExecutor` abstraction -- the type `AsyncConfigurer#getAsyncExecutor()`
actually returns, and the object Spring's `@Async` infrastructure calls `execute()`/`submit()`
on. This is the fix for the post's `AsyncConfig` example.
All three extend the same mechanism [Chapter 2](02-async-virtual-threads.md) already
described: wrap the submitted `Runnable`/`Callable`, capture `SecurityContextHolder.getContext()`
once (at wrap time, not at thread-construction time), and push/pop it around the delegate's
execution on whatever thread that turns out to be.
## The edge case Chapter 1 sets up and this chapter resolves
Chapter 1's whole point was that a **reused pool worker** keeps whatever
`InheritableThreadLocal` value existed when the pool created it, not what the submitting
thread had at submission time -- that's why `MODE_INHERITABLETHREADLOCAL` is dangerous with a
fixed thread pool. The `EDGE` scenario in this demo asks the same question of the
`Delegating*` wrappers, and the answer is the opposite:
```
EDGE) task 1 on possibly-reused worker: authenticated as carol-task1
EDGE) task 2, same pool, different caller context: authenticated as dave-task2 <-- correct, NOT stale
```
Two tasks submitted through `DelegatingSecurityContextExecutorService` to the *same* two-worker
pool, with the caller's `SecurityContextHolder` context changed in between, each see their
**own** context -- never the other task's. That's because the wrapper captures context per
submission (inside `wrap()`, called synchronously from `execute()`/`submit()`), not once per
worker thread the way thread-local inheritance does. This is the actual reason the
`Delegating*` family predates virtual threads by years and is still correct on a fixed pool:
it never depended on thread identity in the first place.
[Chapter 8](08-testing-contract.md) pins this exact contrast as a JUnit assertion
(`delegatingSecurityContextExecutorServicePropagatesAndCapturesIndependentlyPerTask`), not just
a printed line.
## Practical note: which one do you actually need?
If you already have an `AsyncConfigurer` returning a `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor`, wrap it with
`DelegatingSecurityContextAsyncTaskExecutor` and nothing else changes -- `@Async` keeps working
as written. If you're calling `CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(...)` without an explicit executor
anywhere in the codebase, that's the common-`ForkJoinPool` trap in scenario C2; the fix is
always to supply a `DelegatingSecurityContextExecutor`-wrapped executor, never to reach for
`MODE_INHERITABLETHREADLOCAL` as a global patch for one call site.